I’m kind of lost.
I
told Grandpa Munster not long ago that after the expiry of the relevant court-order
this January 2016, there was no way he was going to have to endure any more
interrogation and abuse, which he has endured for many years, from the pair of court-appointed
so-called therapists who one lawyer describes as “…more nutty and batty than
any of their clients;” a pair of crack-pots who no client in their right mind
would ever pay for so-called psychological treatment out of their own pocket,
but who have gotten rich from a 25-year Scooterville courthouse monopoly via
duped taxpayers, strictly for playing watch-dog with former sex offenders.
Watch dogs of the snapping snarling variety, if what I’m told is true from several
of their gratefully-former associates .
I’ve
watched him cry, rage and panic over these visits for almost three years now; more
than the normal time-frame for this court-order, the last set of orders to stipulate
mandatory therapy (and 13 other directives) which are traditionally intended to
expire, leaving one very reasonable set of orders remaining for life.
A
couple days ago we learned that authorities wish to extend the current orders
for another two years for reasons which make it fairly clear that they will
keep at it indefinitely; reasons which are hilariously bogus. Personally I’m
agreeable to the optional orders in theory, if they were managed by authorities
in an enlightened way, but threatening to contest said orders in court is
probably Munster’s only bargaining chip with regards to escaping his therapeutic
torment.
Gramps
is sixty-five and appears significantly older due to poor health and medical
neglect from living in a government-appointed group home serviced by a rug rat
doctor who has probably also never had a client who wasn’t railroaded to him through
government contract.
He
has a severe learning disability and severe anxiety disorder (which have never
been addressed by his therapists) and
is entirely stupefied by any contact with authorities, including the therapists
themselves who intentionally posture themselves as authorities and take
constant liberties, telling him what he can do and can’t do (in the guise of
treatment, I presume they would claim, not that they permit anyone to ask).
Gramps
has not committed a crime in decades.
Our
core strategy was to acquire legal recognition of his disabilities, his inability
to satisfactorily represent himself in legal affairs and the right to designate
an advocate to speak on his behalf, whether a lawyer or myself.
Confident
in all the options and tools I understood to be at our disposal, I made a
personal guarantee to Gramps that he would be done with his oppressors in
January; that I would not allow it to continue; that I would ensure it was stopped
by any means necessary. I knew it to be a grave injustice which weakens, not
aids, Gramps’ mental health, making it more difficult, not easier, to be
productive and safe in the community; an injustice I was prepared to fight by
any means possible, within the law, and possibly beyond.
And
one by one, all the tools and options fell apart in the space of one long
morning.
We
got off the phone with the lawyer yesterday, having a stack of hopes dashed,
and sat there feeling quite incredibly alone in the world. We studied the dismal
options for a couple more hours, and made the desperate move to put our hopes
in one police detective. We literally crossed no-man’s land to seek help from
the “enemy.”
I
coached Gramps at exasperating length until he summoned the courage. He made
the phone call and convinced Good Cop to meet with him without the therapists’
(Bad Cops) presence, but then fell apart trying to arrange my participation in
the meeting. He cried for a while and cursed himself for his stupidity and the
mess he’d made of his life. I plied him with praise and support. He called back
to try again and miraculously Good Cop agreed to let me attend “for moral
support,” and added, “But I’m not going to argue with him!”
I
coached Gramps for a couple more hours yesterday and again today before the
meeting. The strategy was solid:
1
- Find out Good Cop’s intentions regarding renewal of the court-order.
2
- Indicate that you will fight the order in court for the reasons that the
therapy is dysfunctional and intolerable. Use firm words: “I can’t take it
anymore!”
3
- Don’t talk about cutting a deal yet (accepting the orders with the proviso
that a new therapist be appointed.)
And
4 - end the meeting swiftly without mentioning any of our other plans and
concerns. “Anything else Good Cop asks, you’re not ready to talk about it yet.”
The
three of us sat down, and before Good Cop had anything relevant to say, Gramps
fell apart. Every plan went swiftly out the window as he volunteered that he understood
he would need a renewal of orders and cautiously suggested that the therapy was
not ideal; not comfortable. “Could I please have someone else?” He would go on
to volunteer all sorts of ideas which I’d counsel him not to, before I could
stop him.
Knowing
that police make notes and will use one’s words against you, knowing the great
risks, feeling the tremendous pressure of opportunity versus jeopardy, I made
the tough decision to jump in and prayed to get away with it. I adopted the
posture that I was on Good Cop’s side (having intentionally sat beside him) and
began questioning Gramps. “Are you being honest right now?” But every question
was designed to push him in the right direction. For the next 45 minutes I
interjected constantly: “Didn’t you tell me that they call you a liar when you’re
telling the truth…? That you’re scared of them and intimidated by them…? That
you hate them…? That you come home from appointments and cry…? And then get
angry and take out your anger on other, less fortunate residents…? Didn’t you
tell me that getting away from them was the most important thing in your life…?
That you’d rather go back to prison then to have to see them another two years…?
That you’d rather be dead than see them another two years…? That you wish they
were dead!”
Good
Cop listened to all this and more as Gramps tediously tried to indicate that I
was not wrong and that he opens up to me more truthfully than to anyone else,
while still trying to be Good Cop’s loyal lap dog and not be disagreeable with
him. It was painful to witness.
Miraculously,
Good Cop indicated it was somewhat possible to arrange a different therapist
but he was not in favor of it. He indicated it might be possible to remove a
couple other stipulations which have become unnecessarily restrictive. He even suggested
he could do a one-year order instead of two.
I
was thrilled to hear of possible concessions and grateful for his apparent
openness. It became apparent to me that Good Cop dearly wished to avoid a court
battle over these orders which are normally agreed upon between police and
offenders and expedited in court. I knew that Gramps had some power though he
had no courage to use it.
It
was a long meeting but cutting to the chase: Gramps agreed (to me regret) to
meet with he and the therapists tomorrow, without me, to address these complaints
and that if they could not be resolved, there would be a further meeting with
the same foursome plus myself and one or two officials from the Circles of
Support organization (of which I am a volunteer member but currently acting
entirely outside that capacity—their mandate does not permit my current level
of potentially-adversarial involvement.) I am Gramps’ unofficial advocate who thus
far only participates at the whim and mercy of his oppressors.
Was
Good Cop as cautiously gracious as he
appeared, or is he luring Gramps into the wolfs’ den to be coerced into a reconciliation
of some theatrical degree?
I must
expect that Gramps will go into the meeting tomorrow, without me, and
completely freeze and sell the farm. There is no hope of him standing up to his
tormentors to their faces. I know that. I can only pray that he doesn’t sign
anything or agree to anything in terms of renewal of supervisory orders, and
that whatever great volume of damage he does, playing lap dog to them, I can
somehow later undo.
I
thought we’d have a lawyer on our side, you see, but it seems that legal aid
will not provide such without a potential jail sentence in the equation.
I
feel like it suddenly became Gramps and I
against the world, but then – just me against the world, fighting for Gramps, with
him somewhere in between, being used against himself.