I cringe every time the subject
of political correctness arises because I NEVER seem to hear an enlightened opinion. The general concept seems too vague to be relevant. I suggest it can
only be realistically examined in particular examples.
In a perfect world people would
think carefully before speaking or acting, and would demonstrate respect where
it is due, and take responsibility for their words and actions. I realize that
the human ego works against all of that, and for most people, any of that is a
lot to ask.
Most people who I hear
complaining about political correctness, seem to resent it as a cumbersome new
code-system suddenly required to protect them from unjustified criticism. In
other words, they come across as dingbats who don't know that they are dingbats and are
mystified to be finally treated as such.
I personally don't give a flying care
what kids look like at Halloween because they are just kids who are bribed by
candy to look silly for us. Whether you dress up as Einstein or a skeleton I
would happily surrender the tootsie roll without projecting arbitrary social
interpretations onto the poor kid - concerning physics or flaying.
With Christmas just around the
corner I shall grab hold of the nearest bolted-down object and steady myself
for the coming onslaught of grating carol broadcasts and Greeting Debaters. I’m not aware that there is any intelligent debate
to be had or ever was.
As a human being, you can either
think about what you say before you say it, or you can be dull. You can either
say what you mean, or be a dunderhead. You can mean to be respectful or you can
be an asshole.
There are no inherently correct or incorrect
seasonal greetings. It always depends on who you are and who you are
communicating to: how wise, present, dull or dunderheaded you are being.
Let’s remember what Merry
Christmas means. It is short for, “It is my wish that your Christmas will be merry!” Thus “merry Christmas” between
Christians is perfectly appropriate obviously. And as a former Christian I do
not manufacture imaginary harm by hearing it (Don’t get me wrong. I still like
the dude but I’m allergic to some of his worshipers’ habits).
Example two: Wishing “Merry
Christmas” to someone of a specific faith who does not celebrate Christmas but
rather a specific winter ceremony of another name, is either presumptuous, dull
or insincere, depending how well we know the person and their particular divine
bents, or whether we give a damn.
And… example three: A
government-sponsored billboard which wishes “Merry Christmas” to the public appears
balefully ignorant of the fact that much of the taxation which pays for such
trinkets comes from non-Christians or else was chosen to speak to a limited
sector of its public and not to others, which is surely fiscally inefficient!
I won’t bother addressing those
who claim that Canada is a Christian nation
and “Merry Christmas” ought to rule unimpeded (if such dinosaurs still exist).
I will flatter myself so much as to assume that no one of that intellectual
quality would be reading this blog.
Frankly, I don’t care what anyone
says to me, or around me, in between credit card transactions this jolly Productfest
Season. Say what you want and let it reveal something about you!
To anyone who resents this concept
and wishes to dribble arbitrary Merry Christmases everywhere you go, with
clemency, as I have often done, it is surely no great crime. But it reveals we
are lazy, insincere or both, and would be a far more honest person if we kept our mouth shut instead of issuing
artificial sentiments from the tongue and not the heart.
Or
if we all agree instead that we like artificial sentiments from the tongue as a
societal behavior model, then why should it matter what the hell the words are?
Happy
Productfestia!