I’ll
keep this brief:
Grampa
Munster approached me cautiously and made a confession. He says that the
therapists have never been as bad as he has let on, that most of the fault is his for
being secretive and that he now welcomes the prolonging of his temporary court
orders and the continued therapy sessions with those he had formerly labeled his
tormentors. He now blames himself for the dysfunction and torment of his
therapy visits and claims that his complaining about them was just “using them as
escape-goats” (his words). He claims that he will learn to open up to them
properly and upon this progress they will lessen the frequency of visits and
eventually support the expiry of his court orders.
I have
accepted this at face value though I remain well aware of the genuine pain and
anger he has often expressed in the past, aware of these therapists’
lower-order behavior in my own presence, and of all the criticism I have heard about them from former patients, church officials,
security guards, one corrections officer, a parole officer and a lawyer.
I don’t
trust them but it is no longer my business.
I told
Gramps very explicitly that he has the power to end his relationship with these
therapists and demand a new one (this is firmly established and furthermore
established who the new therapist would be: one whom I already have an
excellent working relationship with and who would welcome my occasional
participation at sessions) and that he may choose to continue dealing with the
Gruesome Twosome if he chooses but that I am moving on with my end of our plans
regardless if he is, which means:
I will
expect him to move forward with intentions to get out more on his own, to make
new friends, to sample peer-support group activities and part-time employment
options and that I would help him with all of this at initial stages and to
somewhat cut back on my personal visits with the expectation of all this new
activity more than filling in the gaps, and that if he instead chooses to
reject these initiatives out of interrogation-fear which he currently purports
shall desist, than he shall suffer more loneliness as a consequence of his
choice. Because I have been giving him more time than I can afford for a long
while now, in anticipation of the January 2016 release date and the
opportunities we both counted on.
I
warned that I would be less receptive to letting him vent to me about
maltreatment and less likely to take him on certain excursions if I think that
Thing One or Thing Two might be inclined to interrogate him about it. I am done
with that kind of liability. I will not have these clowns making false accusations
to police that might incriminate me as Munster’s friend or volunteer.
To make
a long story short, I don’t encourage this decision but I will respect it. We
will of course remain friends but I will not feel obliged to suffer any
consequences on account of this decision.
Since
that discussion, things have gone well. I took him out to a support group
meeting and he may follow through with participation on his own or else we will
explore some other group which hopefully requires less of an academically intense process (which
naturally unsettles Gramps). He also took it upon himself to call up the
detective and ask about the possibility of part time employment. The cop was
supportive as he has also been supportive of Gramps’ interest in making new friends
and getting out more.